feat: add allow-permissions (#46)

* feat: add

* up

* up

* add doc
This commit is contained in:
xrkffgg
2021-01-26 17:55:42 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent 4c5e1fa83c
commit f777971d6d
7 changed files with 259 additions and 263 deletions

View File

@@ -400,10 +400,15 @@ jobs:
| labels | Replace the labels of the issue | string | ✖ |
| contents | Add [reaction](#reactions-types) for this comment | string | ✖ |
| close-issue | Whether to close the issue at the same time | string | ✖ |
| allow-permissions | Permission to operate | string | ✖ |
- `duplicate-command`: When setting concise commands, while still supporting the original `Duplicate of`. Block content contains `?`
- `labels`: Highest priority
- `close-issue`: Both `true` or `'true'` can take effect
- `allow-permissions`: When you do not input, there is no limit. Anyone comment will trigger. Optional values are `admin`, `write`, `read`, `none`
- If the team member sets the read permission, it is read
- If the external Collaborator is set to read permission, it is read
- Ordinary users have read permission
⏫ [Back to list](#List)

View File

@@ -400,10 +400,15 @@ jobs:
| labels | 替换该 issue 的 labels | string | ✖ |
| contents | 为该评论的增加 [reaction](#reactions-types) | string | ✖ |
| close-issue | 是否同时关闭该 issue | string | ✖ |
| allow-permissions | 允许操作的权限 | string | ✖ |
- `duplicate-command`:当设置简洁命令时,同时仍支持原有 `Duplicate of`。屏蔽内容包含 `?`
- `labels`:优先级最高
- `close-issue``true``'true'` 均可生效
- `allow-permissions`:当不输时,即无限制。任何人评论都会触发。可选值有 `admin``write``read``none`
- 团队成员若设置 read 权限,则为 read
- 外部 Collaborator 若设置 read 权限,则为 read
- 普通用户为 read 权限
⏫ [返回列表](#列-表)

View File

@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ inputs:
description: 'For mark-duplicate'
duplicate-labels:
description: 'For mark-duplicate add labels'
allow-permissions:
description: 'Only the allow can do. Possible admin, write, read, and none.'
remove-labels:
description: 'For remove labels'
close-issue:

485
dist/index.js vendored

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

View File

@@ -264,10 +264,15 @@ jobs:
| labels | Replace the labels of the issue | string | ✖ |
| contents | Add [reaction](/en-US/guide/ref#-reactions-type) for this comment | string | ✖ |
| close-issue | Whether to close the issue at the same time | string | ✖ |
| allow-permissions | Permission to operate | string | ✖ |
- `duplicate-command`: When setting concise commands, while still supporting the original `Duplicate of`. Block content contains `?`
- `labels`: Highest priority
- `close-issue`: Both `true` or `'true'` can take effect
- `allow-permissions`: When you do not input, there is no limit. Anyone comment will trigger. Optional values are `admin`, `write`, `read`, `none`
- If the team member sets the read permission, it is read
- If the external Collaborator is set to read permission, it is read
- Ordinary users have read permission
<Alert>
Note: Duplicate created with the concise command does not display the content of the red box in the figure below. But in fact this has no effect.

View File

@@ -264,10 +264,15 @@ jobs:
| labels | 替换该 issue 的 labels | string | ✖ |
| contents | 为该评论的增加 [reaction](/guide/ref#-reactions-类型) | string | ✖ |
| close-issue | 是否同时关闭该 issue | string | ✖ |
| allow-permissions | 允许操作的权限 | string | ✖ |
- `duplicate-command`:当设置简洁命令时,同时仍支持原有 `Duplicate of`。屏蔽内容包含 `?`
- `labels`:优先级最高
- `close-issue``true``'true'` 均可生效
- `allow-permissions`:当不输时,即无限制。任何人评论都会触发。可选值有 `admin``write``read``none`
- 团队成员若设置 read 权限,则为 read
- 外部 Collaborator 若设置 read 权限,则为 read
- 普通用户为 read 权限
<Alert>
注意:使用简洁命令创建的 Duplicate 不显示下图红框内容。但其实这个没有任何影响的。

View File

@@ -146,13 +146,28 @@ async function doMarkDuplicate(owner, repo, labels) {
const duplicateLabels = core.getInput('duplicate-labels');
const removeLables = core.getInput('remove-labels');
const closeIssue = core.getInput('close-issue');
const allowPermissions = core.getInput('allow-permissions');
const commentId = context.payload.comment.id;
const commentBody = context.payload.comment.body;
const commentUser = context.payload.comment.user.login;
const issueNumber = context.payload.issue.number;
const ifCommandInput = !!duplicateCommand;
if (allowPermissions) {
const res = await octokit.repos.getCollaboratorPermissionLevel({
owner,
repo,
username: commentUser,
});
const { permission } = res.data;
if (!allowPermissions.includes(permission)) {
core.info(`The user ${commentUser} is not allow!`);
return false;
}
}
if (
!commentBody.includes('?') &&
((ifCommandInput &&