feat: improve examples and migration guide with GitHub context (#505)

* feat: improve documentation with solutions guide and GitHub context

- Add comprehensive solutions.md with 9 complete use case examples
- Fix migration guide examples to include required GitHub context
- Update examples missing GitHub context (workflow-dispatch-agent, claude-modes)
- Enhance README with prominent Solutions & Use Cases section
- Document tracking comment behavior change in automation mode
- All PR review examples now include REPO and PR NUMBER context

Fixes issues reported in discussions #490 and #491 where:
- Migration examples were dysfunctional without GitHub context
- Users lost PR review capability after v0.x migration
- Missing explanation of tracking comment removal in agent mode

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: apply prettier formatting to fix CI

Co-authored-by: kashyap murali <km-anthropic@users.noreply.github.com>

* refactor: streamline examples and remove implementation details

- Remove 5 redundant examples (57% reduction: 12→7 files)
  - Deleted: claude.yml, claude-auto-review.yml, claude-modes.yml,
    claude-args-example.yml, auto-fix-ci-signed/
- Rename examples for clarity
  - pr-review-with-tracking.yml → pr-review-comprehensive.yml
  - claude-pr-path-specific.yml → pr-review-filtered-paths.yml
  - claude-review-from-author.yml → pr-review-filtered-authors.yml
  - workflow-dispatch-agent.yml → manual-code-analysis.yml
  - auto-fix-ci/auto-fix-ci.yml → ci-failure-auto-fix.yml
- Update all examples from @v1-dev to @v1
- Remove implementation details (agent mode references) from docs
- Delete obsolete DIY Progress Tracking section
- Add track_progress documentation and examples

Addresses PR feedback about exposing internal implementation details
and consolidates redundant examples into focused, clear use cases.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: apply prettier formatting to fix CI

Applied prettier formatting to 3 files to resolve CI formatting issues.

Co-authored-by: kashyap murali <km-anthropic@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: claude[bot] <209825114+claude[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kashyap murali <km-anthropic@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kashyap Murali <13315300+katchu11@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
kashyap murali
2025-08-29 16:55:57 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent 45408b4058
commit 3ed14485f8
19 changed files with 778 additions and 576 deletions

View File

@@ -74,13 +74,75 @@ The following inputs have been deprecated and replaced:
```yaml
- uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
with:
prompt: "Review this PR for security issues"
prompt: |
REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
PR NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
Review this PR for security issues
anthropic_api_key: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
claude_args: |
--model claude-4-0-sonnet-20250805
--allowedTools Edit,Read,Write
```
> **⚠️ Important**: For PR reviews, always include the repository and PR context in your prompt. This ensures Claude knows which PR to review.
### Automation with Progress Tracking (New in v1.0)
**Missing the tracking comments from v0.x agent mode?** The new `track_progress` input brings them back!
In v1.0, automation mode (with `prompt` input) doesn't create tracking comments by default to reduce noise. However, if you need progress visibility, you can use the `track_progress` feature:
**Before (v0.x with tracking):**
```yaml
- uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@beta
with:
mode: "agent"
direct_prompt: "Review this PR for security issues"
anthropic_api_key: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
```
**After (v1.0 with tracking):**
```yaml
- uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
with:
track_progress: true # Forces tag mode with tracking comments
prompt: |
REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
PR NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
Review this PR for security issues
anthropic_api_key: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
```
#### Benefits of `track_progress`
1. **Preserves GitHub Context**: Automatically includes all PR/issue details, comments, and attachments
2. **Brings Back Tracking Comments**: Creates progress indicators just like v0.x agent mode
3. **Works with Custom Prompts**: Your `prompt` is injected as custom instructions while maintaining context
#### Supported Events for `track_progress`
The `track_progress` input only works with these GitHub events:
**Pull Request Events:**
- `opened` - New PR created
- `synchronize` - PR updated with new commits
- `ready_for_review` - Draft PR marked as ready
- `reopened` - Previously closed PR reopened
**Issue Events:**
- `opened` - New issue created
- `edited` - Issue title or body modified
- `labeled` - Label added to issue
- `assigned` - Issue assigned to user
> **Note**: Using `track_progress: true` with unsupported events will cause an error.
### Custom Template with Variables
**Before (v0.x):**
@@ -100,10 +162,16 @@ The following inputs have been deprecated and replaced:
- uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
with:
prompt: |
Analyze PR #${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} in ${{ github.repository }}
Focus on security vulnerabilities in the changed files
REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
PR NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
Analyze this pull request focusing on security vulnerabilities in the changed files.
Note: The PR branch is already checked out in the current working directory.
```
> **💡 Tip**: While you can access GitHub context variables in your prompt, it's recommended to use the standard `REPO:` and `PR NUMBER:` format for consistency.
### Environment Variables
**Before (v0.x):**
@@ -244,6 +312,7 @@ You can also pass MCP configuration from a file:
- [ ] Convert `disallowed_tools` to `claude_args` with `--disallowedTools`
- [ ] Move `claude_env` to `settings` JSON format
- [ ] Move `mcp_config` to `claude_args` with `--mcp-config`
- [ ] **Optional**: Add `track_progress: true` if you need tracking comments in automation mode
- [ ] Test workflow in a non-production environment
## Getting Help