mirror of
https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code-action.git
synced 2026-01-22 22:44:13 +08:00
* feat: improve documentation with solutions guide and GitHub context - Add comprehensive solutions.md with 9 complete use case examples - Fix migration guide examples to include required GitHub context - Update examples missing GitHub context (workflow-dispatch-agent, claude-modes) - Enhance README with prominent Solutions & Use Cases section - Document tracking comment behavior change in automation mode - All PR review examples now include REPO and PR NUMBER context Fixes issues reported in discussions #490 and #491 where: - Migration examples were dysfunctional without GitHub context - Users lost PR review capability after v0.x migration - Missing explanation of tracking comment removal in agent mode 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: apply prettier formatting to fix CI Co-authored-by: kashyap murali <km-anthropic@users.noreply.github.com> * refactor: streamline examples and remove implementation details - Remove 5 redundant examples (57% reduction: 12→7 files) - Deleted: claude.yml, claude-auto-review.yml, claude-modes.yml, claude-args-example.yml, auto-fix-ci-signed/ - Rename examples for clarity - pr-review-with-tracking.yml → pr-review-comprehensive.yml - claude-pr-path-specific.yml → pr-review-filtered-paths.yml - claude-review-from-author.yml → pr-review-filtered-authors.yml - workflow-dispatch-agent.yml → manual-code-analysis.yml - auto-fix-ci/auto-fix-ci.yml → ci-failure-auto-fix.yml - Update all examples from @v1-dev to @v1 - Remove implementation details (agent mode references) from docs - Delete obsolete DIY Progress Tracking section - Add track_progress documentation and examples Addresses PR feedback about exposing internal implementation details and consolidates redundant examples into focused, clear use cases. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: apply prettier formatting to fix CI Applied prettier formatting to 3 files to resolve CI formatting issues. Co-authored-by: kashyap murali <km-anthropic@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: claude[bot] <209825114+claude[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: kashyap murali <km-anthropic@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Kashyap Murali <13315300+katchu11@users.noreply.github.com>
76 lines
3.7 KiB
YAML
76 lines
3.7 KiB
YAML
name: Issue Triage
|
|
on:
|
|
issues:
|
|
types: [opened]
|
|
|
|
jobs:
|
|
triage-issue:
|
|
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
|
timeout-minutes: 10
|
|
permissions:
|
|
contents: read
|
|
issues: write
|
|
|
|
steps:
|
|
- name: Checkout repository
|
|
uses: actions/checkout@v4
|
|
with:
|
|
fetch-depth: 0
|
|
|
|
- name: Triage issue with Claude
|
|
uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
|
|
with:
|
|
prompt: |
|
|
You're an issue triage assistant for GitHub issues. Your task is to analyze the issue and select appropriate labels from the provided list.
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT: Don't post any comments or messages to the issue. Your only action should be to apply labels.
|
|
|
|
Issue Information:
|
|
- REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
|
|
- ISSUE_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.issue.number }}
|
|
|
|
TASK OVERVIEW:
|
|
|
|
1. First, fetch the list of labels available in this repository by running: `gh label list`. Run exactly this command with nothing else.
|
|
|
|
2. Next, use the GitHub tools to get context about the issue:
|
|
- You have access to these tools:
|
|
- mcp__github__get_issue: Use this to retrieve the current issue's details including title, description, and existing labels
|
|
- mcp__github__get_issue_comments: Use this to read any discussion or additional context provided in the comments
|
|
- mcp__github__update_issue: Use this to apply labels to the issue (do not use this for commenting)
|
|
- mcp__github__search_issues: Use this to find similar issues that might provide context for proper categorization and to identify potential duplicate issues
|
|
- mcp__github__list_issues: Use this to understand patterns in how other issues are labeled
|
|
- Start by using mcp__github__get_issue to get the issue details
|
|
|
|
3. Analyze the issue content, considering:
|
|
- The issue title and description
|
|
- The type of issue (bug report, feature request, question, etc.)
|
|
- Technical areas mentioned
|
|
- Severity or priority indicators
|
|
- User impact
|
|
- Components affected
|
|
|
|
4. Select appropriate labels from the available labels list provided above:
|
|
- Choose labels that accurately reflect the issue's nature
|
|
- Be specific but comprehensive
|
|
- Select priority labels if you can determine urgency (high-priority, med-priority, or low-priority)
|
|
- Consider platform labels (android, ios) if applicable
|
|
- If you find similar issues using mcp__github__search_issues, consider using a "duplicate" label if appropriate. Only do so if the issue is a duplicate of another OPEN issue.
|
|
|
|
5. Apply the selected labels:
|
|
- Use mcp__github__update_issue to apply your selected labels
|
|
- DO NOT post any comments explaining your decision
|
|
- DO NOT communicate directly with users
|
|
- If no labels are clearly applicable, do not apply any labels
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT GUIDELINES:
|
|
- Be thorough in your analysis
|
|
- Only select labels from the provided list above
|
|
- DO NOT post any comments to the issue
|
|
- Your ONLY action should be to apply labels using mcp__github__update_issue
|
|
- It's okay to not add any labels if none are clearly applicable
|
|
|
|
anthropic_api_key: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
|
|
claude_args: |
|
|
--allowedTools "Bash(gh label list),mcp__github__get_issue,mcp__github__get_issue_comments,mcp__github__update_issue,mcp__github__search_issues,mcp__github__list_issues"
|