Jonathan A. Sternberg b35a0f4718
protobuf: remove gogoproto
Removes gogo/protobuf from buildx and updates to a version of
moby/buildkit where gogo is removed.

This also changes how the proto files are generated. This is because
newer versions of protobuf are more strict about name conflicts. If two
files have the same name (even if they are relative paths) and are used
in different protoc commands, they'll conflict in the registry.

Since protobuf file generation doesn't work very well with
`paths=source_relative`, this removes the `go:generate` expression and
just relies on the dockerfile to perform the generation.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan A. Sternberg <jonathan.sternberg@docker.com>
2024-10-02 15:51:59 -05:00
..
2024-10-02 15:51:59 -05:00
2024-10-02 15:51:59 -05:00
2024-10-02 15:51:59 -05:00
2024-10-02 15:51:59 -05:00

protoc-gen-go-grpc

This tool generates Go language bindings of services in protobuf definition files for gRPC. For usage information, please see our quick start guide.

Future-proofing services

By default, to register services using the methods generated by this tool, the service implementations must embed the corresponding Unimplemented<ServiceName>Server for future compatibility. This is a behavior change from the grpc code generator previously included with protoc-gen-go. To restore this behavior, set the option require_unimplemented_servers=false. E.g.:

  protoc --go-grpc_out=. --go-grpc_opt=require_unimplemented_servers=false[,other options...] \

Note that this is not recommended, and the option is only provided to restore backward compatibility with previously-generated code.

When embedding the Unimplemented<ServiceName>Server in a struct that implements the service, it should be embedded by value instead of as a pointer. If it is embedded as a pointer, it must be assigned to a valid, non-nil pointer or else unimplemented methods would panic when called. This is tested at service registration time, and will lead to a panic in Register<ServiceName>Server if it is not embedded properly.